Democracy is a wonderful thing but to say that it is infallible is incorrect. No government is perfect. "Majority rules" is the best that we have. No person is left out of the count. What if the majority of the people were wrong?
This really is not a political post but a social post about America's ethics. I watched the Golden Globes the other night with a friend of mine. I probably would not have watched them alone yet I found them to be very interesting. I thought that Woody Allen had fallen out of the lime light. There is no doubt in my mind that Woody Allen can be equated with Mary K Latourno. Latourno is married to the child with whom she had sex and Allen is married to the child with whom he had sex. Allen did not have to serve time as Latourno. This is not because Allen is a man, but because he is famous.
One of my mentors and I sang some German songs last year because he was teaching a German class. I must say that I was a bit apprehensive about singing these songs because I found out that the composer, Wolf, was on the side of the Nazis. He explained to me that music is a form of art that takes us to places and transcends our understanding. Giving credit to the composer is merely putting the songs in an historical frame. It is important to understand that Wolf wrote some beautiful music regardless of his life choices.
Woody Allen does not need to be honored. History gives us information on Allen and Wolf and we should keep that at the forefront of our minds. Art is a reflection of the times. The more accurate the reflection, the better the art. That is why something ugly can be so artistically worthwhile. Society at times is just as ugly. I have not seen Woody Allen's movie but I did see Penelope Cruz talking about the movie and showing great excitement over working with Allen. That night Allen was moved to a god like position. People talked about him with a gleam in their eye. Would you speak of Latourno in the same way?
I do understand that people need to be forgiven and we shouldn't judge because we don't know everything but laws in this country are put in place to protect the innocent. Someone that is 18 is still a child because their brain has not fully developed. These children were well under 18.
It just reminds me of O.J. Simpson with that stupid televised trial and Hitler on the cover of Time magazine. In my own profession (and I could not find the sources on the internet) there is a famous conductor who molested young boys and is still being praised because of his fame.
This actually made things feel a bit more normal in my own life. There are times when someone who makes bad choices on a constant basis will be uplifted by society. The opposite is true for those who speak out about it. They will be shunned. If someone is praising Woody Allen after knowing his actions (and shunning Mia Farrow), the only logical conclusion is that society sees what it wants to see.
I know I have chased a few rabbits in this posting but the main thing is that art would be better judged on the basis of its relevance to society and not on the ability or talent of the individual who created it. Secondarily, society's majority is much like a teenager with a new fad. It doesn't have to be ethical nor does it have to make sense. It merely is.